Controlled Natural Language Sentences And Formal Logic
Controlled natural language sentences can have an analogue or isomorphic mapping to sentences of a formal theory of logic. Controlled natural language is a subset of natural language that is designed to be more precise and structured, with the aim of reducing ambiguity and making the language more easily processed by both humans and machines.
Controlled natural languages typically use restricted vocabularies, simplified grammar, and standardized syntax rules. This makes it easier to identify and isolate individual propositions within a sentence, and to analyse the relationships between those propositions.
Once a controlled natural language sentence has been properly analysed and broken down into its component propositions, it is possible to translate those propositions into sentences of a formal theory of logic. This translation process involves identifying the appropriate logical symbols and syntax to represent the propositions, and applying the appropriate rules of inference to draw valid conclusions.
While the process of mapping controlled natural language sentences to a formal theory of logic is not always straightforward, it is generally considered to be more feasible than mapping unconstrained natural language sentences. Controlled natural language provides a structured and standardized framework for expressing ideas and making statements, which makes it easier to translate those statements into the precise and unambiguous language of formal logic.
Unconstrained Sentences in Natural Language
Unconstrained sentences written in natural language cannot be considered isomorphic with sentences of formal logic because natural language is inherently ambiguous and imprecise. Natural language is designed to convey information between human beings, and it often relies on context, connotation, and personal interpretation. It is subject to vagueness, ambiguity, and metaphor, and it can be difficult to precisely determine its meaning in all cases.
Formal logic, on the other hand, is a system of rules and symbols designed to be precise, unambiguous, and consistent. It is not subject to interpretation or context in the same way that natural language is. Formal logic uses symbols and syntax to express statements, and it relies on strict rules of deduction to draw conclusions from those statements.
While it is possible to translate natural language statements into formal logic notation, this translation process is not always straightforward, and it can require a great deal of interpretation and judgement on the part of the translator. As such, sentences written in natural language cannot be considered formal in the same way that sentences of formal logic are, and they cannot be considered isomorphic with those sentences.